Tuesday, August 6, 2024

Broken Hospital Management and the Challenges of Improvement Work



Effective hospital management  rests upon four factors: 

1. Solid actionable data that replaces urban myths about what is and isn't working and therefore who needs to change and what they need to change; Data that can be revised, drilled down and recombined to suit the needs of patients, providers, crew, and management, and erases the natural desire to avoid personal responsibility for house-wide outcomes; recurring reports that help guide and encourage the effort to change in tolerable stages.

2. Consensus on the above, as the foundation for any action, built by management who are good communicators and facilitators and who can bring meaning and value to the data.

3. A willingness among participants to put out the extra effort to act together, based on a solid irrefutable picture that lack of their participation is making the problem worse.

4. The active setting of a vision and a personal commitment to it that gives everyone hope, as a way to help them accept current conditions and their own role in them.

What prevents these simple management behaviors?  

A desire to avoid responsibility to lead by hiring consultants. Consultants can only support your desire and commitment to take a more active role, not a less active one. They can give you tools to become infinitely more effective. But they cannot replace the necessity for hospital leaders to reach out to every single level of management and front line staff, and Listen, Learn, and Lead.


When you find a consulting firm attempting to make your life easier by communicating with your reports and front line staff instead of helping you to do a better job of that, it isn't helping. It's enabling a broken hospital: A symptom of a broken system of management.

When hospital management is broken, it creates a cascade of issues that hinder the organization’s ability to implement improvement work. The consequences of poor management can be dire, affecting staff morale, patient outcomes, and the overall efficiency of the hospital.

The Impact of Broken Hospital Management

1. Communication Breakdown

One of the primary signs of broken hospital management is poor communication. When there is a lack of clear, consistent communication from leadership, staff members are often left in the dark about important decisions, changes in procedures, and organizational goals. This confusion can lead to mistakes, duplications of effort, and a general sense of chaos. Effective communication is essential for coordinating efforts across departments and ensuring that everyone is working towards the same objectives.

2. Low Staff Morale

Inadequate management often leads to low staff morale. When employees feel undervalued, overworked, and unsupported, their job satisfaction plummets. High turnover rates and absenteeism become common, which further exacerbates staffing issues and places additional strain on remaining employees. Low morale can also negatively impact patient care, as disengaged and dissatisfied staff are less likely to go above and beyond in their duties.

3. Inefficiency and Waste

Broken management structures often result in inefficient use of resources. Without proper oversight and strategic planning, hospitals may face issues such as overstocking or understocking of supplies, misallocation of funds, and inefficient workflows. These inefficiencies can lead to increased operational costs and reduced capacity to invest in necessary improvements and innovations.

4. Resistance to Change

When hospital management is ineffective, there is often significant resistance to change. Staff may be skeptical of new initiatives, especially if past efforts have been poorly executed or have failed to deliver promised results. This resistance can make it difficult to implement improvement projects, as gaining buy-in from all stakeholders is crucial for success.

The Challenges of the Day-to-Day Grind


1. Time Constraints

The day-to-day grind of hospital management is filled with urgent demands and high-stakes decisions, leaving little room for proactive improvement work. Healthcare professionals are often stretched thin, dealing with high patient loads, administrative tasks, and emergency situations. Finding time to engage in improvement activities, such as attending training sessions, participating in meetings, and implementing new processes, can be extremely challenging.

2. Resource Limitations

Improvement work requires resources, including time, money, and personnel. In a hospital with broken management, these resources are often scarce. Budget constraints may limit the ability to invest in new technologies or hire additional staff. Moreover, the existing workforce may be too overwhelmed with day-to-day responsibilities to dedicate time to improvement projects. The inability to recruit and retain staff further exacerbates this issue, leading to chronic understaffing and burnout among the remaining employees.


3. Recruitment and Retention Issues

Hospitals struggling with broken management often face significant challenges in recruiting and retaining staff. Competitive salaries, professional development opportunities, and a supportive work environment are essential to attracting and keeping skilled healthcare workers. However, when these elements are lacking, potential recruits are deterred, and existing staff may seek opportunities elsewhere. This vicious cycle of turnover and understaffing not only strains the remaining workforce but also undermines the hospital’s capacity to implement and sustain improvement initiatives.

4. Lack of Clear Vision

Successful improvement work relies on a clear, strategic vision from leadership. Without a coherent plan and defined goals, efforts to improve processes and outcomes can become disjointed and ineffective. Broken management often fails to provide this necessary direction, leaving staff without a clear understanding of what they are working towards and why it matters.

5. Inadequate Support

For improvement work to be successful, staff need support from their leaders. This includes not only financial and logistical support but also encouragement and recognition. In a hospital with poor management, this support is often lacking. Employees may feel that their efforts are not valued or that they are not given the tools and resources they need to succeed.

Conclusion


Broken hospital management presents significant challenges to improvement work. The lack of effective communication, low staff morale, inefficiency, and resistance to change all hinder the ability to implement necessary improvements. Additionally, the day-to-day grind of managing a hospital, compounded by the inability to recruit and retain staff, creates a situation where improvement efforts are continually sidelined. Overcoming these challenges requires a concerted effort to address the root causes of poor management, invest in resources, and foster a culture of continuous improvement. Only by doing so can hospitals ensure that they are providing the best possible care to their patients and creating a positive work environment for their staff.

Tuesday, July 23, 2024

Vacancy Brainstorming

Hospital and Clinic Staffing Flight

Vacancy Brainstorming


Purpose:

To ensure optimal staffing, morale, efficiency, patient access and service by identifying and addressing gaps and opportunities with creativity, collaboration and management engineering. These should be the basic practices and expectations of any exceptional hospital for any new investment: We investigate and engineer efficiency first, before spending money.


Common Scenarios:

1. Workload Variation: Positions might be closed due to insufficient work, though this is rare in healthcare. More often, vacancies lead to unmet tasks or lower volumes, unless filled or creatively managed.  


Recruit Replace Retrain and Retain

It is common practice, though short-sited, to look at current volumes and merely staff to them without investigation. Where turnover is higher, lower margin is the natural result. This is counter-intuitive to older thinking. What appears as a reduced volume may in fact be a self-inflicted wound on the hospital's margin  by its failure to recruit, replace, retrain and retain.

Consider the simple truth that an hour of professional labor often produces several times the dollar impact on margin than the labor cost of that hour. 

Considering the nature of incremental volume and incremental income, the potential to improve the bottom line rapidly, even faster than labor consolidation, needs to be investigated. Is a reduction of volume due to leakage? That's immediately available for recapture if we have the resources and the efficiencies to do so.


2. Often lagging volume is a flag for lost competitive standing or leakage: High turnover often means loss of crucial and valuable talent. All those skills must be replaced, retrained, restored. And their absence has an inevitable impact on the quality of care, patient access, scheduling efficiency, vigilance, and yes, volume.

What looks like an opportunity to reduce staff may in fact be a need to re-invest and regain both market share and higher patient access. But this can only be determined if the processes of care, scheduling and coordination, leakage and potential demand in this region are investigated, understood. With that understanding must follow appropriate retraining, rehiring of needed talent, and reengineering for optimal patient, provider and surgeon ease-of-use and efficiency of service.

Solutions: Work simplification, better scheduling, cross-training, on-call pools,  networking with partner organizations to build shared staffing pools (Engineered Staffing Pools, or ESP), and process improvements are all part of the process of building and rebuilding the hospital. Creative solutions require piloting to optimize teamwork. And this is the best possible management and team building exercise because the result is better patient access and service right along with enhanced morale and crew retention.


Daily Management System - an essential platform for teamwork and better service

The Daily Management System tools are utilized daily for planning and evaluation, and they provide critical information for improving efficiency through vacancy brainstorming among supervisors and managers.  A daily management system provides immediate feedback for any new pilots tested. The goal is to adapt more efficient approaches by analyzing daily work variations, and to do so rapidly.

Where there are needs for investment, the daily management system provides hard evidence for exactly what those needs are,  to those who are not in the department but who participate in the decision-making. The system also provides evidence for improved efficiency and patient demand that are crucial as evidence for further investment.

For those in the department, the daily management system provides objective feedback as the appropriate balancing context for subjective experience.


Key Questions for Staffing Plans and Performance Evaluation:


Staff Training:

1. Is the staff sufficient for projected requirements?

2. Is there a proper mix of skills and experience?

3. Are training efforts maximizing employee potential?

4. Are employees motivated to broaden their abilities?


Method:

1. Are current methods effective for timely, quality service delivery?

2. Are service interruptions caused by internal or external factors?

3. Do job assignments support good organization or cause interruptions?

4. Are work redundancies necessary or performance circumventions?

5. Are outdated practices still in use?

6. Are activities holdovers from outdated technology?


Department Structure:

1. Does current work compartmentalization enhance throughput and output?

2. Are there excessive cross-departmental hand-offs causing delays?


Work Balancing:

1. Are work activities assigned based on need?

2. Is there a mechanism for assigning project work or time-off during low activity?

3. Is each person working at a reasonable pace?

4. Are employees' skills fully utilized?

5. Is work scheduling based on workload plans and reviewed regularly?


Communication:

1. Are goals and objectives measurable and communicated effectively?

2. Do all levels of staff communicate goals and share resources as needed?

3. Is accountability for shared outcomes established?

4. How many times must requests be made before action is taken?


Individual Performance:

1. Is each employee providing quality services within time limits?

2. How does the manager track completed duties?

3. How easy is it for employees to contribute to department goals?

4. Who contributes to the department’s progress, and how can more employees be engaged?

5. Is contributing to change rewarding or punishing for employees?

6. Is each employee working to the top of their license (spending most of their time on the activities that require their training and certification, and less time on tasks that could be delegated through coordination and skill mix?)


Additional Vacancy Brainstorming Questions:

1. What unique skills are needed that aren't currently available?

2. Is there a financial return for the position?

3. How is work prioritized and distributed?

4. How would the workload be managed without filling the position?

5. Are there cross-training opportunities?

6. Can work be shifted to other sites or rescheduled?

7. Will changes in hours help avoid costs without losing patient volume?

8. What is the impact on agency or overtime use?

9. Is the department meeting quality measures?

10. Is the workload increasing?

11. Does the job status match the vacancy?

12. Are there opportunities for skill mix savings?

13. Is the position hard to fill, requiring lengthy recruiting?



Vacancy Brainstorming Submission To the Weekly Workforce Steering Team


When Requesting A Replacement of Crew Resources:

- Date Submitted:

- Submitted By:

- Title:

Assessment Summary:

"We have completed an assessment using the process, performance, and vacancy brainstorming questions, reviewed available data, and brainstormed alternatives with other leads and managers. Below is our conclusion."


Details:

- Cost Center

- Position Name

- Job Code

- Budget Paid FTEs

- Vacancy Date

- Annual Cost Impact


Task Review and Engineering:

- Prioritize tasks by necessity

- Identify who can do high-priority work now and after cross-training

- Find efficiencies for lower-priority tasks

- Address workload and staffing gaps

- Explore technology to reduce task time

- Brainstorm alternatives with peers


Results and Support Needs:

- Short, middle, and long-term plans for change

- Temporary coverage while re-engineering work

- Milestone dates


Hospital and Clinic Staffing Flight



Thursday, June 27, 2024

 Hospitals in Crisis?

Staff shortages are crippling hospitals. As a healthcare productivity consulting group, HS4HS / Compirion can help! We specialize in strategies to boost staff retention, optimize workflows, and empower your workforce through telehealth and cross-training, while capturing leakage and growing your bottom line. In nearly forty years of consulting we have never recommended a layoff. Why turn to firms that specialize in layoffs when trying to optimize your margin through retention and growth? Let's create a more efficient and sustainable healthcare system, together.
www.hs4hs.org
www.compirion.com
#staffretention#Nur

singleadership#performanceimprovement#Hospitalexecutive